The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
“Persecution,” 15 August 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Letter, Emma Smith to Thomas Carlin, 16 August 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Letter, Thomas Carlin to Emma Smith, 24 August 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Letter, Emma Smith to Thomas Carlin, 27 August 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Letter, Thomas Carlin to Emma Smith, 7 September 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Letter, Justin Butterfield to Sidney Rigdon, 20 October 1842 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Warrant, 31 December 1842, Willard Richards Copy [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Affidavit, 2 January 1843, Willard Richards Copy [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Wilson Law and Others, Affidavit, 4 January 1843, Justin Butterfield Copy [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Account of Hearing, 4 January 1843 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Decision, 5 January 1843, as Reported by Willard Richards [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Decision, 5 January 1843, as Reported by John Taylor and Others [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] “The Release of Gen. Joseph Smith,” 14 January 1843 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault] Affidavit, 20 July 1842 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Warrant, 2 August 1842 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Petition, 8 August 1842 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Habeas Corpus, 8 August 1842 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Docket Entry, 31 August 1843 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Transcript of Proceedings, 18 November 1843 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Order, 23 November 1843 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Venire Facias, 2 December 1843 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Docket Entry, 11 December 1843 [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Motion, circa 11 December 1843–A [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault] Motion, circa 11 December 1843–B [Extradition of Rockwell for Assault]

Account of Hearing, 4 January 1843 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault]

Source Note

Account of Hearing,
Springfield

Settled by 1819. Incorporated as town, 1832. Became capital of Illinois, 1837. Incorporated as city, 1840. Sangamon Co. seat. Population in 1840 about 2,600. Stake of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organized in Springfield, Nov. 1840; discontinued...

More Info
, Sangamon Co., IL, 4 Jan. 1843, Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault (United States Circuit Court for the District of IL 1843); in JS, Journal, 1842–1844, Book 1, pp. 50–73; handwriting of
Willard Richards

24 June 1804–11 Mar. 1854. Teacher, lecturer, doctor, clerk, printer, editor, postmaster. Born at Hopkinton, Middlesex Co., Massachusetts. Son of Joseph Richards and Rhoda Howe. Moved to Richmond, Berkshire Co., Massachusetts, 1813; to Chatham, Columbia Co...

View Full Bio
; JS Collection, CHL.

Historical Introduction

See Introduction to Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault.

Page 71

Ill[inois]

Became part of Northwest Territory of U.S., 1787. Admitted as state, 1818. Population in 1840 about 480,000. Population in 1845 about 660,000. Plentiful, inexpensive land attracted settlers from northern and southern states. Following expulsion from Missouri...

More Info
passed a Law to prevent any person from speaking disrespe[c]tfully of her inability to pay her debts <​we​> Might have ½ the
city of N York

Dutch founded New Netherland colony, 1625. Incorporated under British control and renamed New York, 1664. Harbor contributed to economic and population growth of city; became largest city in American colonies. British troops defeated Continental Army under...

More Info
<​before our cou[r]ts​> for Saying we could not pay our
48

TEXT: Possibly “their” or “her”.


debts.— Alabama ag[ain]st
N. York

Located in northeast region of U.S. Area settled by Dutch traders, 1620s; later governed by Britain, 1664–1776. Admitted to U.S. as state, 1788. Population in 1810 about 1,000,000; in 1820 about 1,400,000; in 1830 about 1,900,000; and in 1840 about 2,400,...

More Info
— in case of Williams—
49

In October 1842 Butterfield explained in detail the legal basis of this defense of JS in a letter written to Sidney Rigdon. The State of Alabama v. Williams case was the foundation of his argument. Robert G. Williams, an abolitionist residing in New York, was indicted by an Alabama court in 1835 on charges of “intending to produce conspiracy, insurrection and rebellion among the slave population” for distributing his antislavery paper The Emancipator in the latter state. In his request for Williams’s extradition, Alabama governor John Gayle stated that Williams was not in the state when the crime was committed and had not “fled” as the wording in the Constitution required, “according to the strict literal import of that term.” Gayle argued that the term “fled” should be interpreted as “evade” and that Williams should be extradited even though he had not physically fled from the justice of Alabama. New York governor William Marcy, though personally highly critical of abolitionism, rejected this interpretation and refused to extradite Williams, maintaining his stance that a fugitive must physically flee the jurisdiction of the state attempting extradition. The Alabama requisition papers, Gayle’s letter, and Marcy’s lengthy response were printed in the Albany Argus. (Justin Butterfield, Chicago, IL, to Sidney Rigdon, [Nauvoo, IL], 20 Oct. 1842, copy, Sidney Rigdon, Collection, CHL; “Requisition of the Governor of Alabama,” Albany Argus, 7 Jan. 1836, [2].)


Comprehensive Works Cited

Rigdon, Sidney. Collection, 1831–1858. CHL. MS 713.

Albany Argus. Albany, NY. 1825–1856.

Wms had been Spiritually there had not fl[e]d— f[r]om the Justice of that state. <​the​> Right to demand & power to give up coextensive. <​
Gov Marcys [William Marcy]

12 Dec. 1786–4 July 1857. Lawyer, politician. Born at Sturbridge (later Southbridge), Worcester Co., Massachusetts. Son of Jedediah Marcy and Ruth Larned. Moved to Woodstock, Windham Co., Connecticut, 1804; to Newport, Newport Co., Rhode Island, 1805; to ...

View Full Bio
was not an ab[o]litionist as the Gent wo[u]ld intimate​>— ⅔
Gov Marcy

12 Dec. 1786–4 July 1857. Lawyer, politician. Born at Sturbridge (later Southbridge), Worcester Co., Massachusetts. Son of Jedediah Marcy and Ruth Larned. Moved to Woodstock, Windham Co., Connecticut, 1804; to Newport, Newport Co., Rhode Island, 1805; to ...

View Full Bio
’s Message to abuse abolitionist
50

The message cited is probably a reference to New York governor Marcy’s message to the New York state legislature of 5 January 1836. Marcy made it clear that he had protected New York abolitionist Williams from extradition to Alabama because his alleged seditious acts “arose from acts done within this State.” (Documents of the Assembly of the State of New-York, no. 2, pp. 29–39.)


Comprehensive Works Cited

Documents of the Assembly of the State of New-York, Fifty-Ninth Session, 1836. Vol. 1, From No. 1 to No. 42 Inclusive. Albany: E. Croswell, 1836.

that an attempt should be made to deliver up a man who has never ben out of the state strikes at all the liberty— <​of our instituti[o]ns​> his fate to day may bee yours tomorrow [p. 71]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page 71

Document Information

Related Case Documents

Documents Related to Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault

Editorial Title
Account of Hearing, 4 January 1843 [Extradition of JS for Accessory to Assault]
ID #
18149
Total Pages
24
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • Willard Richards

Footnotes

  1. [48]

    TEXT: Possibly “their” or “her”.

  2. [49]

    In October 1842 Butterfield explained in detail the legal basis of this defense of JS in a letter written to Sidney Rigdon. The State of Alabama v. Williams case was the foundation of his argument. Robert G. Williams, an abolitionist residing in New York, was indicted by an Alabama court in 1835 on charges of “intending to produce conspiracy, insurrection and rebellion among the slave population” for distributing his antislavery paper The Emancipator in the latter state. In his request for Williams’s extradition, Alabama governor John Gayle stated that Williams was not in the state when the crime was committed and had not “fled” as the wording in the Constitution required, “according to the strict literal import of that term.” Gayle argued that the term “fled” should be interpreted as “evade” and that Williams should be extradited even though he had not physically fled from the justice of Alabama. New York governor William Marcy, though personally highly critical of abolitionism, rejected this interpretation and refused to extradite Williams, maintaining his stance that a fugitive must physically flee the jurisdiction of the state attempting extradition. The Alabama requisition papers, Gayle’s letter, and Marcy’s lengthy response were printed in the Albany Argus. (Justin Butterfield, Chicago, IL, to Sidney Rigdon, [Nauvoo, IL], 20 Oct. 1842, copy, Sidney Rigdon, Collection, CHL; “Requisition of the Governor of Alabama,” Albany Argus, 7 Jan. 1836, [2].)

    Rigdon, Sidney. Collection, 1831–1858. CHL. MS 713.

    Albany Argus. Albany, NY. 1825–1856.

  3. [50]

    The message cited is probably a reference to New York governor Marcy’s message to the New York state legislature of 5 January 1836. Marcy made it clear that he had protected New York abolitionist Williams from extradition to Alabama because his alleged seditious acts “arose from acts done within this State.” (Documents of the Assembly of the State of New-York, no. 2, pp. 29–39.)

    Documents of the Assembly of the State of New-York, Fifty-Ninth Session, 1836. Vol. 1, From No. 1 to No. 42 Inclusive. Albany: E. Croswell, 1836.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06