in the margin with these words “This Paragraph relates to respondants,”
They verily believe were made Bonafide to Bonafide purchasers in said deeds respectively named as the grantees thereof, and for the valuable considerations actually paid at the several times thereof in said deeds respectively mentioned, and without any fraudulent intent design or purpose whatever, or to hinder, or delay or defraud the complainants or any other persons in the collection of any debts whatever.
And they further answer each for himself,
That under the grantees in said deeds from Joseph Smith mentioned in said Paragraph to which their names are respectively written opposite in the margin as aforesaid.
They respectively claim the premises in such conveyances described as indicated in such paragraph, by divers rights and conveyances bonafide obtained all interest which said Joseph Smith deceased had in such premises but which are too numerous and complicated to make exhibit of and set forth in this answer.
These respondants deny that said Joseph Smith deceased at the time of his death had any interest whatever in said South East qr. of section 2 Town 6 North Range 9 West or of or in any of the premises in this answer mentioned and set forth.
These Respondants further state, that their said purchasers <purchases> in this answer mentioned from, through and under said while sole as aforesaid and from through and under said and her said husband Lewis C. Bidaman after her said marriage with him, were made in good faith and for valuable consideration as before herein stated bonafide.
That said purchases were made on account and by reason, that the said conveyance in complainants bill mentioned from said Joseph and to said Joseph Smith as Trustee of said Church in said bill mentioned as they were advised was illegal and void for want of sufficient parties thereto and that the title thereby to said premises still remains in said and for the purpose of obtaining the undisputed title thereof to the premises claimed by them respectively.
But whether the said deed was and is in fact so void in Law, these respondants are unable to answer.
And respondants also claim by virtue of said conveyances last mentioned from said and from said and her said present husband, Bidamon, title in fee according to the import of said conveyances.