Footnotes
For more information on the establishment of Missouri as Zion, see Revelation, 20 July 1831 [D&C 57].
Neither this letter nor the aforementioned 2 June 1832 letter from John Corrill is extant. (See Letter to Edward Partridge et al., 14 Jan. 1833.)
Letter to Edward Partridge et al., 14 Jan. 1833. A 20 July 1831 revelation instructed Gilbert to serve as an agent for the church and to “establish a store” to obtain money for the “good of the Saints.” (Revelation, 20 July 1831 [D&C 57:6, 8].)
Letter to Edward Partridge et al., 14 Jan. 1833. In his January 1833 letter to Phelps, JS stated, “Let me say to you, seek to purefy yourselves, & also all the inhabitants of Zion lest the Lords anger be kindled to fierceness, repent, repent, is the voice of God, to Zion.” JS called the revelation that accompanied the January letter to Phelps the “Olieve leaf which we have plucked from the tree of Paradise” and “the Lords message of peace to us” because he saw it as a way to heal ongoing difficulties with Missouri church leaders. (Letter to William W. Phelps, 11 Jan. 1833; Revelation, 27–28 Dec. 1832 [D&C 88:1–126].)
Pettegrew, “History,” 15.
Pettegrew, David. “An History of David Pettegrew,” not after 1858. Pettigrew Collection, 1837–1858, 1881–1892, 1908–1930. CHL.
Minute Book 2, 26 Feb. 1833.
This letter is no longer extant.
The Evening and the Morning Star mentioned the letter only to refer to Sidney Rigdon’s proselytizing efforts in Medina County, Ohio, which are discussed near the end of the missive. ([William W. Phelps], “The Progress of the Church of Christ,” The Evening and the Morning Star, June 1833, 100.)
The Evening and the Morning Star. Independence, MO, June 1832–July 1833; Kirtland, OH, Dec. 1833–Sept. 1834.
See 1 Thessalonians 5:23; 1 Corinthians 1:8; Psalm 12:7; and Book of Mormon, 1830 ed., 345 [Alma 44:4].
John Corrill was a counselor to Bishop Edward Partridge. Corrill’s confession may have been an apology for writing an accusatory letter to JS in the summer of 1832. Though the letter has not survived, JS described it as stirring up matters that he thought had been settled and forgiven and said that it made “absolutely false” charges, including allegations that JS sought after “Monarchal power.” In short, JS wrote, “I do not fellowship the letter which was writen to me by Bro. John & neither the spirit thereof.” An epistle sent from Kirtland to church leaders in Missouri in mid-January 1833 also addressed Corrill’s charge that JS had been “seeking after Monarchal power and authority,” declaring that “we are sensable that this is not the thing Bro J is seeking after.” The high council instead declared that JS was only trying to “magnify the high office and calling whereunto he has been called and appointed by the command of God.” (Letter to William W. Phelps, 31 July 1832; Letter to Edward Partridge et al., 14 Jan. 1833; see also Winn, “‘Such Republicanism as This’: John Corrill’s Rejection of Prophetic Rule,” 46–50.)
Winn, Kenneth H. “‘Such Republicanism as This’: John Corrill’s Rejection of Prophetic Rule.” In Differing Visions: Dissenters in Mormon History, edited by Roger D. Launius and Linda Thatcher, 45–75. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994.