The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Discourse, 25 February 1843

Source Note

JS, Discourse, [, Hancock Co., IL, 25 Feb. 1843]. Featured version copied [ca. 25 Feb. 1843] in JS, Journal, bk. 1, 21 Dec. 1842–10 Mar. 1843, pp. [219]–[222]; handwriting of ; JS Collection, CHL. For more complete source information, see the source note for JS, journal, 1842–1844.

Historical Introduction

On 25 February 1843, JS delivered a discourse in , Illinois, to the Nauvoo City Council regarding the city government’s ability to demand payment for fees and taxes in gold and silver coin. At the time of this sermon, Nauvoo was in a dire financial situation owing to a proliferation of city scrip. This discourse demonstrated JS’s increasing preference for using “hard money” to finance the city and the construction of the and the .
During the financially depressed years of the late 1830s and early 1840s, many Americans became either “soft money” or “hard money” supporters. Soft money advocates called on municipalities and private banks to continue printing paper money to increase inflation and relieve debtors, while hard money advocates believed the proliferation of paper currency would destabilize the economy and unfairly disadvantage creditors. Consistent with the soft-money trends, began issuing its own city scrip in early 1842. Because the scrip was redeemable by the city treasury, however, it became a source of financial problems for Nauvoo. On 13 January, a little more than a month before this February discourse, informed the Nauvoo City Council that the city treasury then had only about forty dollars of currency that could be accepted in other towns. Evidently aware of the limited acceptability of the city scrip, several Nauvoo residents had asked to exchange the scrip for currency that would be honored in locations outside of Nauvoo. The following day, the city collector presented a report to the council showing that during 1841, only $43.06 of taxes was paid in cash, while $430.50 was paid in city scrip. Together with Clayton’s letter, the report demonstrated the city’s growing financial difficulties occasioned by the city scrip, which had been issued in order to promote growth in the city but held no worth in other towns.
Responding to these problems, JS expressed his own displeasure about the decreasing worth of ’s paper money and encouraged the Saints not to use it to purchase stock in the or to donate toward the . During a 21 February discourse, JS called for gold and silver coin rather than jewelry, brass kettles, and other items—including paper money—to fund the construction of buildings, promising his audience that using gold and silver would establish sound currency in the city. On 23 February, JS burned twenty-three dollars of Nauvoo city scrip and reportedly declared, “So may all uncurrent. & unsound money go down as this burns.” On the morning of 25 February 1843, the Nauvoo City Council met and debated “a Bill for regulating the Currency.” The bill mandated that “Gold and Silver Coin only be received as lawful tender in payment of City Taxes, and of debts, and also of fines.” In addition, the proposed ordinance prohibited the further release of city scrip and fined individuals for passing any paper currency within the city.
JS’s journal suggests that during the city council’s morning session, JS questioned whether the council should pass the ordinance. Upon consulting the Constitution between the morning and afternoon sessions, he determined that the first clause of article 1, section 10, allows states to accept gold and silver coin as legal tender and that the state of allowed the to do the same. In addition, JS’s reading of the clause apparently convinced him that the Illinois stay and appraisal laws were unconstitutional. Convinced that the proposed ordinance regulating currency was the proper course for the city to take, JS delivered his 25 February 1843 discourse to the Nauvoo City Council during its afternoon session. The city council passed an ordinance regulating currency in Nauvoo at its 4 March meeting.
made the only extant record of this sermon in JS’s journal. Although JS gave the discourse in a meeting of the City Council, the city council minutes for 25 February 1843 do not include any of his comments to the group.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    See Howe, What Hath God Wrought, 373–395; and Lepler, Many Panics of 1837, chap. 1.

    Howe, Daniel Walker. What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848. The Oxford History of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Lepler, Jessica M. The Many Panics of 1837: People, Politics and the Creation of a Transatlantic Financial Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

  2. [2]

    Nauvoo City Scrip, 14 July 1842.

  3. [3]

    William Clayton, Nauvoo, IL, to Nauvoo City Council, 13 Jan. 1843, Nauvoo, IL, Records, CHL.

  4. [4]

    Collector’s Report, 14 Jan. 1843, Nauvoo, IL, Records, CHL.

  5. [5]

    Discourse, 21 Feb. 1843.

  6. [6]

    JS, Journal, 23 Feb. 1843.

  7. [7]

    Nauvoo City Council Rough Minute Book, 25 Feb. 1843, 9.

  8. [8]

    Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 4 Mar. 1843, 167. The council amended the ordinance between the time the group discussed it on 25 February and passed the final version on 4 March to ensure that city scrip could still be used for payment in certain instances. (See Nauvoo City Council Rough Minute Book, 4 Mar. 1843, 10.)

  9. [9]

    Article 1, section 10, clause 1, reads, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.” Nauvoo’s charter allowed the city to collect taxes and “enforce the payment of the same in any manner to be provided by ordinance, not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States, or of this State.” (Act to Incorporate the City of Nauvoo, 16 Dec. 1840.)

  10. [10]

    An Act to Amend “An Act concerning Judgments and Executions, Approved, January 17th, 1825” [19 Feb. 1841], Laws of the State of Illinois [1840–1841], pp. 168–171; An Act Entitled “Act Regulating the Sale of Property on Judgments and Executions” [6 Jan. 1843], Laws of the State of Illinois [1842–1843], pp. 186–189. The 1843 act expanded on an act passed in 1841. Following the financial panics of 1837 and 1839, many states passed similar stay and appraisal laws to allow relief for debtors. (An Act Regulating the Sale of Property [27 Feb. 1841], Laws of the State of Illinois [1840–1841], pp. 172–173; Balleisen, Navigating Failure, 12.)

    Laws of the State of Illinois, Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835. Vandalia, IL: J. Y. Sawyer, 1835.

    Balleisen, Edward J. Navigating Failure: Bankruptcy and Commercial Society in Antebellum America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.

  11. [11]

    JS, Journal, 25 Feb. 1843.

  12. [12]

    Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 4 Mar. 1843, 167–168.

  13. [13]

    See Nauvoo City Council Rough Minute Book, 25 Feb. 1843, 8–9.

Asterisk (*) denotes a "featured" version, which includes an introduction and annotation. *Discourse, 25 February 1843 Journal, December 1842–June 1844; Book 1, 21 December 1842–10 March 1843 History Draft [1 January–3 March 1843] History, 1838–1856, volume D-1 [1 August 1842–1 July 1843] “History of Joseph Smith”

Page [220]

the Ligislature have ceded up to us the privilige of enacting laws we stand in the same relation as the state.— This clause is for the Legislature, is not a law— for the people. diametrically contra[r]y to the constitution. this have passed a stay law. making it lawful <​to​> tender to property. and if we creat[e] no law. we must be govend [governed] by them.— shall we be such fools as to abide their laws. which are unconstitutional? No. we will make a law for Gold & Silver then their law ceases & we can collect our debts.— “Powers not delegated to the states— or reservd fr[o]m the states” is constituti[o]nal, [p. [220]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [220]

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Discourse, 25 February 1843
ID #
1000
Total Pages
4
Print Volume Location
JSP, D11:474–477
Handwriting on This Page
  • Willard Richards

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    JS and other Nauvoo citizens interpreted the state legislature’s granting of the city charter as its giving the city government broad powers similar to those that the federal constitution granted to the states, provided Nauvoo’s laws were “not repugnant” to either the United States Constitution or the constitution of Illinois. (See Act to Incorporate the City of Nauvoo, 16 Dec. 1840; “Remarks on Chartered Rights,” Wasp, 24 Dec. 1842, [2]; and Historical Introduction to Ordinance, 14 Nov. 1842.)

    The Wasp. Nauvoo, IL. Apr. 1842–Apr. 1843.

  2. [2]

    Appraisal laws regulated the work of county appraisers, while stay laws provided debtors with additional time to pay their debts before creditors could seize their property for payment. The new Illinois laws stipulated that foreclosed property could not be sold for less than two-thirds of its appraised value. If the property remained unsold, it would return to the debtor. Another law allowed the debtor twelve months to redeem the property and avoid foreclosure. The laws’ opponents feared that as a result of the depressed real estate market at the time, the two-thirds requirement would make sale of the property impossible. The provisions prohibited the creditor from simply auctioning the property to the highest bidder. (An Act Entitled “An Act Regulating the Sale of Property on Judgments and Executions” [6 Jan. 1843], Laws of the State of Illinois [1842–1843], pp. 186, 188, secs. 1, 4; An Act to Amend “An Act concerning Judgments and Executions, Approved, January 17th, 1825” [19 Feb. 1841], Laws of the State of Illinois [1840–1841], pp. 168–169, sec. 1; see also Bronson v. Kinzie et al., 1 Howard 311 [1843].)

    Laws of the State of Illinois, Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835. Vandalia, IL: J. Y. Sawyer, 1835.

    Howard / Howard, Benjamin C. Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States. 25 vols. Various publishers. 1843–1860.

  3. [3]

    TEXT: Possibly “there”.

  4. [4]

    JS’s statement regarding powers not delegated to the states paraphrases the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06