Docket Entry, Judgment, 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery]

Home >
The Papers >

Introduction to Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery Capias ad Respondendum, 6 June 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery] Special Bail, 10 June 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery] Declaration, circa 7 July 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery] Docket Entry, Judgment, 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery]
Docket Entry, Judgment, 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery]
Source Note
Docket Entry, Judgment, [
Chardon
Located eight miles south of Lake Erie and immediately east of Kirtland Township. Settled by 1812. Included village of Chardon. Population of township in 1820 about 430; in 1830 about 880; and in 1840 about 1,100. Two of JS’s sisters resided in township. ...
More Info
, Geauga Co., OH], [27 Oct. 1837], Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery (Geauga Co., OH, Court of Common Pleas 1837); Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Journal, vol. N, p. 252; handwriting of
David D. Aiken
20 Sept. 1794–12 Dec. 1861. County clerk, associate judge, merchant. Born in New York. Baptized into Episcopalian church, 9 Aug. 1818, in New York. Married Laura Loomis. Moved to Brown, Stark Co., Ohio, by 1820; to Painesville, Geauga Co., Ohio; and to Chardon...
View Full Bio
; Geauga County Archives and Records Center, Chardon, OH.
Historical Introduction
See Introduction to Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery.
Page 252
Hide editing marks

Winthrop Eaton
7 Aug. 1808–8 Dec. 1842. Merchant. Born in Framingham, Middlesex Co., Massachusetts. Son of Levi Eaton and Susan. Moved to New York City, by 1830. Married Maria Antoinette Valentine, 31 Jan. 1833, in New York City. Summoned, along with JS and others, in connection...
View Full Bio
)

154 vs)
Ass[umpsi]
An action brought to recover damages for breach of a simple contract or for the recovery of money. Assumpsit was a form of trespass on the case. In Ohio law, it was “the usual remedy upon promissory notes.”
View Glossary
t
An action brought to recover damages for breach of a simple contract or for the recovery of money. Assumpsit was a form of trespass on the case. In Ohio law, it was “the usual remedy upon promissory notes.”
View Glossary
.

Smith &
[Oliver] Cowdery
3 Oct. 1806–3 Mar. 1850. Clerk, teacher, justice of the peace, lawyer, newspaper editor. Born at Wells, Rutland Co., Vermont. Son of William Cowdery and Rebecca Fuller. Raised Congregationalist. Moved to western New York and clerked at a store, ca. 1825–1828...
View Full Bio
)

Leave is given to the
plff
View Full Bio
to amend
instanter
Command to act immediately, “taken to mean ‘before the rising of the court,’ when the act is to be done in court; or, ‘before the shutting of the office the same night,’ when the act is to be done there.”
View Glossary
. And thereupon the said Joseph Smith Junr. being called comes not— It is therefore considered that the
plff
View Full Bio
s recover against the said Joseph Smith Jr. the sum of eleven hundred and eighty-five dollars and sixty-six cents their damages by the court here assessed, and also their costs. [p. 252]
View entire transcript
|
Cite this page
Source Note
Document Transcript
Page 252
Document Information
Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Docket Entry, Judgment, 27 October 1837 [Eaton v. JS and O. Cowdery]
ID #
4461
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
David D. Aiken