The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery Summons, 28 March 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Declaration, circa 29 April 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Docket Entry, Judgment, 5 June 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 5 June 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 5 June 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Assignment of Judgment, 17 March 1838 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Notice, 1 May 1838 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery] Docket Entry, Motion, 4 May 1841 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery]

Docket Entry, Judgment, 5 June 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery]

Source Note

Docket Entry, Judgment, [
Chardon

Located eight miles south of Lake Erie and immediately east of Kirtland Township. Settled by 1812. Included village of Chardon. Population of township in 1820 about 430; in 1830 about 880; and in 1840 about 1,100. Two of JS’s sisters resided in township. ...

More Info
, Geauga Co., OH], [5 June 1837], G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery (Geauga Co., OH, Court of Common Pleas 1837); Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Journal, vol. N, p. 190; handwriting of
David D. Aiken

20 Sept. 1794–12 Dec. 1861. County clerk, associate judge, merchant. Born in New York. Baptized into Episcopalian church, 9 Aug. 1818, in New York. Married Laura Loomis. Moved to Brown, Stark Co., Ohio, by 1820; to Painesville, Geauga Co., Ohio; and to Chardon...

View Full Bio
; Geauga County Archives and Records Center, Chardon, OH.

Historical Introduction

See Introduction to G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery

Page 190

Geo. A. H. [George A. H. Patterson]

ca. 1810–23 Sept. 1843. Hardware and crockery merchant. Likely born in New York. Son of Robert Patterson and Rebecca. Lived in Hudson, Columbia Co., New York. Moved to Buffalo, Erie Co., New York, by 1832. Operated hardware and crockery businesses, beginning...

View Full Bio
&
John Patterson

ca. 1812–1 Jan. 1852. Hardware and crockery merchant. Likely born in New York. Son of Robert Patterson and Rebecca. Moved to Buffalo, Erie Co., New York, by 1832. Operated hardware and crockery businesses, beginning 1832, in Buffalo. Involved in case of G...

View Full Bio
)
162. vs.)
Assumpsit

An action brought to recover damages for breach of a simple contract or for the recovery of money. Assumpsit was a form of trespass on the case. In Ohio law, it was “the usual remedy upon promissory notes.”

View Glossary
—
Reynolds Cahoon

30 Apr. 1790–29 Apr. 1861. Farmer, tanner, builder. Born at Cambridge, Washington Co., New York. Son of William Cahoon Jr. and Mehitable Hodges. Married Thirza Stiles, 11 Dec. 1810. Moved to northeastern Ohio, 1811. Located at Harpersfield, Ashtabula Co.,...

View Full Bio
et. al)
The defts. being three times demanded to come into Court & defend this suit, come not but make default. It is therefore considered that the Plffs. recover against the defts. their damages by the Court here assessed, to six hundred & ten dollars & thirty seven cents, & also their costs. [5 lines blank] [p. 190]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page 190

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Docket Entry, Judgment, 5 June 1837 [G. Patterson and J. Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery]
ID #
4518
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • David D. Aiken

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06