Footnotes
That the high council with appellate authority was identified as the “high Council at the seat of the general government of the Church” (rather than this newly organized Kirtland high council) suggests that JS anticipated a time when the seat of church government would not be at Kirtland.
Minute Book 2, 3 and 7 July 1834.
For examples of the Kirtland and Far West high councils serving in appellate capacities, see Minute Book 1, 18 Nov. 1835; and Minute Book 2, 14 Apr. 1838.
For examples of the Nauvoo high council serving in an appellate capacity, see Nauvoo High Council Minutes, 15 Jan. and 18 Feb. 1843.
Nauvoo High Council Minutes, 1839–1845. CHL. LR 3102 22.
and | |
, | |
This wording suggests that the duties of the high council would be limited to hearing appeals of decisions made by other councils on disciplinary matters. However, on several occasions—including the first case it heard—the high council appears to have functioned as the court of original jurisdiction.a In practice, the council’s duties extended well beyond “settleing important difficulties” between different parties and included determining church policy, assigning missionaries to their fields of labor, and making plans to help church members in Missouri who had been driven from their homes in Jackson County.b At the 19 February meeting in which these revised minutes were accepted, JS blessed the members of the high council with “wisdom and power to counsel in righteousness upon all subjects that might be laid before them,” suggesting that JS understood that the council’s responsibilities would include more than overseeing church discipline.c
(aSee, for example, Minutes, 19 Feb. 1834; and Minute Book 1, 28–29 Aug. 1834; 10, 18, and 19 Aug. 1835. bSee, for example, Minutes, 20 Feb. 1834; Minutes, 24 Feb. 1834; and Minute Book 1, 18 Jan. and 24 Aug. 1835. cMinutes, 19 Feb. 1834.)The appointment of JS, Rigdon, and Williams as presidents of the council was separate from the three men’s earlier appointment to the presidency of the high priesthood.
These nine individuals were the high priests at the meeting who had not been selected to serve as a president or counselor in the newly formed high council.
These elders, priests, and other church members composed the larger council who voted “in the name, and for the church” in favor of organizing the standing council of twelve high priests and were separate from the council of twenty-four high priests from which the fifteen-man high council and its presidency were drawn.