Docket Entry, Leave to Amend, 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]

Home >
The Papers >

Introduction to Rounds qui tam v. JS Summons, 9 February 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Declaration, 22 April 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Leave to Amend, 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Judgment, 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Assignment of Judgment, 1 March 1838 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
Docket Entry, Leave to Amend, 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
Source Note

Docket Entry, Leave to Amend,
Chardon
Located eight miles south of Lake Erie and immediately east of Kirtland Township. Settled by 1812. Included village of Chardon. Population of township in 1820 about 430; in 1830 about 880; and in 1840 about 1,100. Two of JS’s sisters resided in township. ...
More Info
, Geauga Co., OH, 10 June 1837, Rounds
qui tam
An action in qui tam imposes a statute-based penalty that rewards both the informant and the state by giving the “penalty in part to whosoever will sue for the same, and the other part to the commonwealth.”
View Glossary
v. JS (Geauga Co., OH, Court of Common Pleas 1837); Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Journal, vol. N, p. 223; handwriting of Charles H. Foot; Geauga County Archives and Records Center, Chardon, OH. Transcription from a digital color image made of the original in 2011.

Historical Introduction
See Introduction to Rounds qui tam v. JS.
Page 223
Hide editing marks

Samuel D. Rounds
ca. 1807–after 1887. Builder, brick mason, farmer. Born in Massachusetts. Son of John J. Rounds and Hannah. Married Amy Hatfield. Moved to New York, by 1830; and to Ohio, by 1834. Initiated legal actions against JS, Sidney Rigdon, and others involved in Kirtland...
View Full Bio

Qui tam
An action in qui tam imposes a statute-based penalty that rewards both the informant and the state by giving the “penalty in part to whosoever will sue for the same, and the other part to the commonwealth.”
View Glossary
.) Debt.

78. vs)

Joseph Smith Jr.)

This cause came on to be heard upon a
demurrer
English common law courts developed a complex process of pleading in civil suits that required the parties to file a series of legal documents, or pleadings, in order to define the dispute precisely. Courts in England’s American colonies and, later, in the...
View Glossary
to the declaration of the pl[ainti]ff & was argued by counsel, on consideration thereof whereof, it is adjudge that the said demurrer be overruled with costs on motion of the def[endan]t leave is given him to amend— on payment of the costs— and this cause is continued until the next term— [p. 223]
View entire transcript
|
Cite this page
Source Note
Document Transcript
Page 223
Document Information
Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Docket Entry, Leave to Amend, 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
ID #
4516
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
Charles H. Foot