Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
- Home >
- The Papers >
Introduction to United States v. Haws et al.
Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Nathaniel Childs Jr. Copy
Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Charles B. Penrose Copy
Summons, 25 April 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Declaration, circa 7 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Docket Entry, Judgment, 11 June 1842–30 January 1851 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Transcript of Proceedings, circa 11 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Docket Entry, Fieri Facias, circa 18 July 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Report of United States Marshal, 22 July 1842 [U.S. v. Haws et al.]
Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
Source Note
Source Note
, Report, [, Cook Co.], IL, to Solicitor of the Treasury, [Charles B. Penrose], , ca. June 1842, U.S. v. Haws et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of IL 1842); printed form with manuscript additions in unidentified handwriting; signature of ; one page; Reports about Debt Proceedings against JS and Others, Contained in Periodic Reports of the United States Attorneys and Marshals of the Solicitor of the Treasury, Case Files and Other Records Relating to Suits, 1791–1929, Records of the Solicitor of the Treasury, Record Group 206, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC; microfilm at CHL.
Historical Introduction
Historical Introduction
Page [1]
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY OF THE ,
District of
[blank] day of [blank] 1842
I herewith report the following PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED in the Circuit Court of the for the [blank] District of Illinois By returnable at the June Term 1842—
Respectfully yours,
U. S. Attorney for the [blank] District of
[T]he Solicitor of the Treasury.
[No]te.— When the suit is in rem, state the things seized, and the claimant’s name, (if known,) instead of the principal and sureties. Suits against Postmasters and their sureties, and Mail Contractors, and against persons for violating the Post-Office laws, are not to be reported to the Solicitor of the Treasury.
| PRINCIPAL. | SURETIES. | FORM OF . | ON WHAT BROUGHT. | NUMBER. | DATE. | WHEN DUE. | AMOUNT. | WHEN RECEIVED. | WHEN INSTITUTED. | |
| Dollars. | Cents. | |||||||||
| , , [Jos]eph Smith, and ✓ | Debt | Promissory Note | Sept. 10th 1841 | 8 mos from date | $4866 | 38 | April 20th 1842 | April 20th 1842 | ||
[p. [1]]
Source Note
Source Note
Document Transcript
Page [1]
Document Information
Document Information
- Related Case Documents
United States v. Haws et al., 11 June 1842
- Editorial Title
- Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.]
- ID #
- 18978
- Total Pages
- 1
- Print Volume Location
- Handwriting on This Page
- Printed text
- Unidentified
- Justin Butterfield
Footnotes
Footnotes
Signature of Justin Butterfield.