Skip to main content

Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]

  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to United States v. Haws et al. Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Nathaniel Childs Jr. Copy Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Charles B. Penrose Copy Summons, 25 April 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Declaration, circa 7 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Docket Entry, Judgment, 11 June 1842–30 January 1851 [United States v. Haws et al.] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 11 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Docket Entry, Fieri Facias, circa 18 July 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 22 July 1842 [U.S. v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]

Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]

Source Note

, Report, , Sangamon Co., IL, to Solicitor of the Treasury [Charles B. Penrose], [], 23 Jan. 1844, U.S. v. Haws et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of IL 1842); printed form with manuscript additions in unidentified handwriting; signature of ; one page; Case Files and Other Records Relating to Suits, 1791–1929, Records of the Solicitor of the Treasury, Record Group 206, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC; microfilm at CHL.

Historical Introduction

Page [1]

OFFICE OF THE MARSHAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
District of Illinois
23d day of January— 1844
SIR:
I herewith report the following FINAL RETURNED at the December term of the Circuit & District Courts of the United States for the District of which ended on the 23d. day of December 1843.
Respectfully yours,
U. S. Marshal for the —— District of
To the Solicitor of the Treasury.
Note.— When the proceeding is in rem, state the thing seized, and the claimant’s name, (if known,) instead of the defendant.
DEFENDANT. FORM OF PROCESS. ON WHAT BROUGHT. NUMBER. DATE. AMOUNT OF JUDGMENT. DATE OF JUDGMENT. INTEREST. COSTS. WHEN RETURNED. NATURE OF RETURN. REMARKS.
Dollars. Cents. Dollars. Cents. Dollars. Cents.
[. . .]
Joseph Smith & with " " [] Note Apl. 23. 1842 5,184 31 June 11. 1842 41. 96◊◊◊ Dec. 18. " [1843] Nulla bona
[. . .]
The above is a true statement of the returns, as the cases in which the returns are made are as above stated
clk Circuit [2 words illegible] [p. [1]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [1]

Document Information

Related Case Documents

United States v. Haws et al., 11 June 1842

Editorial Title
Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]
ID #
5899
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • Printed text
  • Unidentified
  • William Prentiss

Footnotes

  1. new scribe logo

    Signature of William Prentiss.

  2. [1]

    TEXT: Other entries separate headings from the United States v. Haws et al. entry.

  3. [2]

    TEXT: Other entries separate the United States v. Haws et al. entry from the certification.